Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT Image 2.6 Flare
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs —).
| Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT Image 2.6 Flare | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $8.00 | $5.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $40.00 | — |
| Blended price (3:1) | $16.00 | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $1.25 |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Intelligence index | 64.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 5 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-11-07 | 2026-11-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or GPT Image 2.6 Flare?
Claude Fable 5.2 and GPT Image 2.6 Flare are priced identically.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT Image 2.6 Flare: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. GPT Image 2.6 Flare: — tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, GPT Image 2.6 Flare ≈ $10,000.
More comparisons
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs Hy4Claude Fable 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalClaude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nano Banana 2.1Claude Fable 5.2 vs Mistral Large 4Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Hy4GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Kimi K3.1 Pro