Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemma 2 27B

Google
$0.65 / $0.65
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 5.9× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 8K).
Gemma 2 27BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.65$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.65$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.65$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.04
Context window8K262K
Max output2K131K
Intelligence index12.9
Coding index26.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2024-07-132026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 5.9× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons