Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
M
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 5.7× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 33K).
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Llama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.10
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.03
Context window33K1.3M
Max output8K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index8.2
Providers3
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-10-072025-04-05
Retirement2027-03-15

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 5.7× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ≈ $1,850, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons