Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Google
Verdict: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
Claude Fable 5.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.30
Output price / 1M$40.00$2.50
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.03
Context window1M33K
Max output128K8K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072025-10-07
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ≈ $1,850.

More comparisons