DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Google
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 5.8× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.29$2.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.03
Context window1M33K
Max output393K8K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-172025-10-07
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 5.8× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ≈ $1,850.

More comparisons