Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
MiniMax
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 3.2× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.15
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.015
Context window33K1M
Max output8K524K
Intelligence index—29.1
Coding index——
Providers—11
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-10-072026-10-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 3.2× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ≈ $1,850, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons