Extract vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Extract is 5.0× cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
| Extract | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.04 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | Free | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.03 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 1M | 1.3M |
| Max output | 900K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-13 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Extract or Llama 4 Scout?
Extract is 5.0× cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Extract vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Extract: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Extract ≈ $80.00, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Extract vs GPT-6.1 TerraExtract vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProExtract vs Kimi K3.1 ProExtract vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashExtract vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Extract vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLExtract vs Gemini 4 ArgonExtract vs Claude Haiku 5.5Extract vs Nano Banana 2.1Extract vs Mistral Large 4Extract vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProExtract vs GPT-6.1 SolExtract vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Extract vs GLM 5.3 PrimeExtract vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeExtract vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLlama 4 Scout vs Kimi K3.1 ProLlama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 5.5