Extract vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Extract is 133.3× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| Extract | Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.04 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | Free | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.03 | $4.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.20 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 900K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Extract or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Extract is 133.3× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Extract vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: which has a bigger context window?
Extract: 1,000,000 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Extract ≈ $80.00, Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000.
More comparisons
Extract vs GPT-6.1 TerraExtract vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProExtract vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashExtract vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Extract vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLExtract vs Gemini 4 ArgonExtract vs Claude Haiku 5.5Extract vs Nano Banana 2.1Extract vs Mistral Large 4Extract vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProExtract vs GPT-6.1 SolExtract vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Extract vs GLM 5.3 PrimeExtract vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeExtract vs Command A+Extract vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 ArgonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nano Banana 2.1