DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Pareto 26.10

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.045 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.10

Unbiased
$0.80 / $3.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
U
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 8.8× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashPareto 26.10
Input price / 1M$0.045$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.50$3.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.16$1.40
Cached input / 1M$0.006$0.03
Context window1M1M
Max output944K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers40—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Pareto 26.10?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 8.8× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $340.00, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.

More comparisons