DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Arcee Ai

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Arcee Ai
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.6× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (28.6 vs 10.8). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Trinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.06
Context window1M262K
Max output393K80K
Intelligence index28.610.8
Coding index—25.8
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-04-01
Retirement—2026-10-26

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Trinity Large Thinking?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.6× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons