DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.45 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 8.2× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.45
Output price / 1M$0.29$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$1.21
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M128K
Max output393K16K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—22.1
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172025-07-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 8.2× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons