DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 2.4× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.042
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.0623
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.0084
Context window1M262K
Max output393K33K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-09-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 2.4× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Ling 3.0 Flash Sante ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons