R1 vs Ministral 3 3B 2512
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 11.5× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. R1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (11.4 vs 4.8). Ministral 3 3B 2512 has the larger context window (131K vs 64K).
| R1 | Ministral 3 3B 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.70 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.10 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.15 | $0.10 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.01 |
| Context window | 64K | 131K |
| Max output | 16K | 105K |
| Intelligence index | 11.4 | 4.8 |
| Coding index | 24.6 | 4.8 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2025-12-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 or Ministral 3 3B 2512?
Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 11.5× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 vs Ministral 3 3B 2512: which has a bigger context window?
R1: 64,000 tokens. Ministral 3 3B 2512: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, Ministral 3 3B 2512 ≈ $250.00.
More comparisons
R1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 vs Command A+R1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 vs GPT-6 SolR1 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 vs Grok 4.7R1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs Command A+Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs GPT-6 LunaMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs GPT-6 SolMinistral 3 3B 2512 vs Claude Opus 5.5