Command A vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mistral Medium 3.5 is 31% cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (14.2 vs 13.1). Mistral Medium 3.5 has the larger context window (262K vs 256K).
| Command A | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $1.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $7.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 210K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 14.2 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 46.9 |
| Providers | 1 | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is 31% cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Mistral Medium 3.5: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProMistral Medium 3.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMistral Medium 3.5 vs Command A+Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 LunaMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 SolMistral Medium 3.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5