Command A vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A

Cohere
$2.50 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 48.6× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.6 vs 13.1). Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has the larger context window (262K vs 256K).
Command ALing 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$2.50$0.06
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$4.38$0.09
Cached input / 1M—$0.012
Context window256K262K
Max output8K236K
Intelligence index13.122.6
Coding index27.855.6
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-03-132026-08-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 48.6× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

Command A: 256,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons

Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Claude Opus 5.5