Command A vs Kimi K2.6
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Kimi K2.6 is 2.6× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K2.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27 vs 13.1). Kimi K2.6 has the larger context window (262K vs 256K).
| Command A | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.95 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $4.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $1.71 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.16 |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 27 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 61.8 |
| Providers | 1 | 22 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-04-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 is 2.6× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Kimi K2.6: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5