Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Kimi K2.6 is 3.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Kimi K2.6 | Qwen3.8 Max Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.95 | $4.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.00 | $12.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.71 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 236K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 27 | — |
| Coding index | 61.8 | — |
| Providers | 22 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2026-09-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
Kimi K2.6 is 3.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.
More comparisons
Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K2.6 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K2.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed