Command A vs Granite 4.2 8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 40.7× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.1 vs 11.1). Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 131K).
| Command A | Granite 4.2 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.06 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.015 |
| Context window | 256K | 131K |
| Max output | 8K | 118K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 11.1 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 22.4 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-08-31 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Granite 4.2 8B?
Granite 4.2 8B is 40.7× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Granite 4.2 8B: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $245.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProGranite 4.2 8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGranite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGranite 4.2 8B vs Command A+Granite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 LunaGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 SolGranite 4.2 8B vs Claude Opus 5.5