Command A vs Gemma 3 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Gemma 3 12B is 58.3× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.1 vs 3.8). Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 131K).
| Command A | Gemma 3 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.05 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.15 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.075 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 131K |
| Max output | 8K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 3.8 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 5.8 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2025-03-13 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemma 3 12B?
Gemma 3 12B is 58.3× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Gemma 3 12B: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Gemma 3 12B: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Gemma 3 12B ≈ $175.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemma 3 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemma 3 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemma 3 12B vs Command A+Gemma 3 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemma 3 12B vs GPT-6 LunaGemma 3 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemma 3 12B vs GPT-6 SolGemma 3 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5