Command A vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A

Cohere
$2.50 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
G

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google
$0.25 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
G
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 7.8× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 66K).
Command ANano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Input price / 1M$2.50$0.25
Output price / 1M$10.00$1.50
Blended price (3:1)$4.38$0.56
Cached input / 1M
Context window256K66K
Max output8K59K
Intelligence index13.1
Coding index27.8
Providers12
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoNo
Released2025-03-132026-06-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A or Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 7.8× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): which has a bigger context window?

Command A: 256,000 tokens. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 65,536 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ≈ $1,250.

More comparisons