Claude Opus 5.5 vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
G

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google
$0.25 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
G
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 14.2× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
Claude Opus 5.5Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.25
Output price / 1M$20.00$1.50
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.56
Cached input / 1M$0.20
Context window1M66K
Max output128K59K
Intelligence index57.6
Coding index
Providers112
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-222026-06-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 14.2× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 65,536 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ≈ $1,250.

More comparisons