Command A vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A

Cohere
$2.50 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
G

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
G
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 3.9× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 131K).
Command ANano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Input price / 1M$2.50$0.50
Output price / 1M$10.00$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$4.38$1.13
Cached input / 1M
Context window256K131K
Max output8K33K
Intelligence index13.1
Coding index27.8
Providers12
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoNo
Released2025-03-132026-06-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 3.9× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): which has a bigger context window?

Command A: 256,000 tokens. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ≈ $2,500.

More comparisons