Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic
$1.00 / $5.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 22.2× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 16.9). Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window (262K vs 200K).
Claude Haiku 4.5Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$1.00$0.06
Output price / 1M$5.00$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$2.00$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.012
Context window200K262K
Max output64K33K
Intelligence index16.924.6
Coding index43.957
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-10-152026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 22.2× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5: 200,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 4.5 ≈ $4,500, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons