Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command A+
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A+ is 3.3× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window (200K vs 192K).
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command A+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $5.00 | $1.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.60 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 200K | 192K |
| Max output | 64K | 64K |
| Intelligence index | 16.9 | — |
| Coding index | 43.9 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command A+?
Command A+ is 3.3× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command A+: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Haiku 4.5: 200,000 tokens. Command A+: 192,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 4.5 ≈ $4,500, Command A+ ≈ $1,350.
More comparisons
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed