Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic
$1.00 / $5.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
D

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.14 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
D
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 9.5× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.5 vs 16.9). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$1.00$0.14
Output price / 1M$5.00$0.42
Blended price (3:1)$2.00$0.21
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.0042
Context window200K1M
Max output64K131K
Intelligence index16.939.5
Coding index43.9
Providers26
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-10-152026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 9.5× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5: 200,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 4.5 ≈ $4,500, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00.

More comparisons