Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic
$1.00 / $5.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 8.7× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$1.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$5.00$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$2.00$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.016
Context window200K1M
Max output64K131K
Intelligence index16.9
Coding index43.9
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-10-152026-09-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 8.7× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 4.5 ≈ $4,500, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons