Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic
$1.00 / $5.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Z
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 8.4× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 16.9). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 200K).
Claude Haiku 4.5GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$1.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$5.00$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$2.00$0.24
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.05
Context window200K1.3M
Max output64K944K
Intelligence index16.941.8
Coding index43.971.5
Providers31
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-10-152026-08-26
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 8.4× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5: 200,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 4.5 ≈ $4,500, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons