Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Z
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 33.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 41.8). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$20.00$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.24
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.05
Context window1M1.3M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index57.641.8
Coding index71.5
Providers1131
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-08-26
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 33.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons