GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GPT-6 Luna is 16% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 37.3). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1.1M).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.24 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | $0.01 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 944K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | 41.8 | 37.3 |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 31 | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is 16% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. GPT-6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, GPT-6 Luna ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Command A+GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 SolGPT-6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed