Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Reflection

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Reflection
$0.25 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Reflection
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 2.9× cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
Beam 1.0 501B A23BLlama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M$0.25$0.10
Output price / 1M$1.00$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.44$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.05—
Context window1M1.3M
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—8.2
Providers—4
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-162025-04-05
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 2.9× cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Beam 1.0 501B A23B ≈ $1,000, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons