Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Reflection

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Reflection
$0.25 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Qwen (Alibaba)
$4.00 / $12.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Reflection
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 13.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Beam 1.0 501B A23B has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Beam 1.0 501B A23BQwen3.8 Max Prime
Input price / 1M$0.25$4.00
Output price / 1M$1.00$12.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.44$6.00
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.50
Context window1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers—1
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-162026-09-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 13.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Beam 1.0 501B A23B ≈ $1,000, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.

More comparisons