Pareto vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

U

Pareto

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
U
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 16.3× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
ParetoQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$2.50$0.15
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$3.75$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.25$0.016
Context window262K1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers—1
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-172026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Pareto or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 16.3× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Pareto vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Pareto: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Pareto ≈ $8,750, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons

Pareto vs GLM 5.3 PrimePareto vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePareto vs Command A+Pareto vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto vs GPT-6 LunaPareto vs GPT-6 Sol ProPareto vs GPT-6 SolPareto vs Claude Opus 5.5Pareto vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedPareto vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashPareto vs Grok 4.7Pareto vs GLM 5.3 FlashXPareto vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashPareto vs GPT-6 AstraPareto vs GPT-6 Astra ProPareto vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5