GPT-6 Sol vs Pareto
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Pareto is 6% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
| GPT-6 Sol | Pareto | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $2.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $7.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $3.75 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 47.5 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 7 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Pareto?
Pareto is 6% cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6 Sol vs Pareto: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6 Sol: 1,050,000 tokens. Pareto: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Sol ≈ $9,000, Pareto ≈ $8,750.
More comparisons
GPT-6 Sol vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Command A+GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.7GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-6 Sol vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Pareto vs GLM 5.3 PrimePareto vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePareto vs Command A+Pareto vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto vs GPT-6 LunaPareto vs GPT-6 Sol ProPareto vs Claude Opus 5.5Pareto vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed