Pareto vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 20% cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Pareto | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $7.50 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.75 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.25 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 45.4 |
| Coding index | — | 76.2 |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-03 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Pareto or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 20% cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Pareto vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?
Pareto: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Pareto ≈ $8,750, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
Pareto vs GLM 5.3 PrimePareto vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePareto vs Command A+Pareto vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto vs GPT-6 LunaPareto vs GPT-6 Sol ProPareto vs GPT-6 SolPareto vs Claude Opus 5.5Pareto vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedPareto vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashPareto vs Grok 4.7Pareto vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashPareto vs GLM 5.3 FlashXPareto vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashPareto vs GPT-6 AstraPareto vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 5.5