Grok 4.7 vs Pareto

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

Grok 4.7

xAI
$1.60 / $4.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
U
Verdict: Grok 4.7 is 36% cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 262K).
Grok 4.7Pareto
Input price / 1M$1.60$2.50
Output price / 1M$4.80$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$2.40$3.75
Cached input / 1M$0.40$0.25
Context window500K262K
Max output450K131K
Intelligence index46.4—
Coding index——
Providers4—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-09-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Pareto?

Grok 4.7 is 36% cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Grok 4.7 vs Pareto: which has a bigger context window?

Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens. Pareto: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600, Pareto ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons

Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Pareto vs GLM 5.3 PrimePareto vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePareto vs Command A+Pareto vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto vs GPT-6 LunaPareto vs GPT-6 Sol ProPareto vs GPT-6 SolPareto vs Claude Opus 5.5