GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Pareto

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
U
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 6.4× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXPareto
Input price / 1M$0.37$2.50
Output price / 1M$1.25$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$3.75
Cached input / 1M$0.09$0.25
Context window1M262K
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182026-09-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Pareto?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 6.4× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Pareto: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Pareto ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Pareto vs GLM 5.3 PrimePareto vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePareto vs Command A+Pareto vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto vs GPT-6 LunaPareto vs GPT-6 Sol ProPareto vs GPT-6 SolPareto vs Claude Opus 5.5