Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.66 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
Q
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 6.8× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 33K).
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.08$0.66
Output price / 1M$0.20$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.74
Cached input / 1M$0.04
Context window262K33K
Max output131K29K
Intelligence index12.9
Coding index26.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-08-112024-11-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 6.8× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ≈ $1,820.

More comparisons