MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Xiaomi

$4.35 / $8.70

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA

$0.08 / $0.20

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 49.4× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed	Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M	$4.35	$0.08
Output price / 1M	$8.70	$0.20
Blended price (3:1)	$5.44	$0.11
Cached input / 1M	$0.036	$0.04
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	131K	131K
Intelligence index	—	12.9
Coding index	—	26.8
Providers	1	4
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2026-08-11
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 49.4× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons