GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

GPT-6 Luna Pro

OpenAI

$0.10 / $0.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.66 / $1.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: GPT-6 Luna Pro is 3.7× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Luna Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 33K).

	GPT-6 Luna Pro	Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Input price / 1M	$0.10	$0.66
Output price / 1M	$0.50	$1.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.20	$0.74
Cached input / 1M	$0.01	—
Context window	1.1M	33K
Max output	128K	29K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	6	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	No
Released	2026-09-22	2024-11-11
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna Pro or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

GPT-6 Luna Pro is 3.7× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna Pro: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Luna Pro ≈ $450.00, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ≈ $1,820.

More comparisons