Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.66 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 10.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
Claude Opus 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.66
Output price / 1M$20.00$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.74
Cached input / 1M$0.20
Context window1M33K
Max output128K29K
Intelligence index57.6
Coding index
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-222024-11-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 10.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ≈ $1,820.

More comparisons