Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs UI-TARS 7B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
B

UI-TARS 7B

Bytedance
$0.10 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
B
Verdict: UI-TARS 7B is 38% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 128K).
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyUI-TARS 7B
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.20$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.13
Cached input / 1M$0.10
Context window131K128K
Max output118K2K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingNoNo
Released2026-06-042025-07-22
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or UI-TARS 7B ?

UI-TARS 7B is 38% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs UI-TARS 7B : which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. UI-TARS 7B : 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00, UI-TARS 7B ≈ $300.00.

More comparisons