Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Step 3.7 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Step 3.7 Flash

StepFun
$0.20 / $1.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
S
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.2× cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Step 3.7 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyStep 3.7 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.20$1.15
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.44
Cached input / 1M$0.04
Context window131K262K
Max output118K230K
Intelligence index
Coding index39.6
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-042026-05-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Step 3.7 Flash?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.2× cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Step 3.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Step 3.7 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00, Step 3.7 Flash ≈ $975.00.

More comparisons