Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Seed 1.6

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
B

Seed 1.6

ByteDance Seed
$0.25 / $2.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
B
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 3.4× cheaper than Seed 1.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Seed 1.6 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetySeed 1.6
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.20$2.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.69
Cached input / 1M
Context window131K262K
Max output118K33K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-042025-12-23
Retirement2026-11-11

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Seed 1.6?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 3.4× cheaper than Seed 1.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Seed 1.6: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Seed 1.6: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00, Seed 1.6 ≈ $1,500.

More comparisons