Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Sakana Namazu

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Sakana Namazu

Sakana
$0.95 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
S
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 8.6× cheaper than Sakana Namazu on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Sakana Namazu has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetySakana Namazu
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.95
Output price / 1M$0.20$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$1.71
Cached input / 1M$0.15
Context window131K262K
Max output118K66K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-042026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Sakana Namazu?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 8.6× cheaper than Sakana Namazu on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Sakana Namazu: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Sakana Namazu: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00, Sakana Namazu ≈ $3,900.

More comparisons