Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
Q
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 5.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyQwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.42
Output price / 1M$0.20$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.085
Context window131K1M
Max output118K131K
Intelligence index33.7
Coding index68.1
Providers116
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-042026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Qwen3.8 27B?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 5.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons