Muse Glimmer 30B vs Summarize
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Summarize is 17.5× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Summarize has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Muse Glimmer 30B | Summarize | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.04 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.20 | Free |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.52 | $0.03 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.04 | — |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | 6.3 | — |
| Coding index | 49 | — |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-08-09 | 2026-10-13 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Summarize?
Summarize is 17.5× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Summarize: which has a bigger context window?
Muse Glimmer 30B: 131,072 tokens. Summarize: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Muse Glimmer 30B ≈ $1,200, Summarize ≈ $80.00.
More comparisons
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 4 CarbonMuse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Fable 5.2Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMuse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMuse Glimmer 30B vs Hy4Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMuse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6.1 TerraMuse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMuse Glimmer 30B vs Kimi K3.1 ProMuse Glimmer 30B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Glimmer 30B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLMuse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 4 ArgonMuse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nano Banana 2.1Muse Glimmer 30B vs Mistral Large 4Summarize vs Gemini 4 CarbonSummarize vs Claude Fable 5.2Summarize vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashSummarize vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashSummarize vs Hy4Summarize vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalSummarize vs GPT-6.1 TerraSummarize vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro