Saba vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 2.7× cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 33K).
| Saba | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.20 | $0.08 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.30 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.02 | $0.04 |
| Context window | 33K | 262K |
| Max output | 26K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 12.9 |
| Coding index | — | 26.8 |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-02-17 | 2026-08-11 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Saba or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 2.7× cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Saba vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Saba ≈ $700.00, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.
More comparisons
Saba vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSaba vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSaba vs Command A+Saba vs GPT-6 Luna ProSaba vs GPT-6 LunaSaba vs GPT-6 Sol ProSaba vs GPT-6 SolSaba vs Claude Opus 5.5Saba vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedSaba vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSaba vs Grok 4.7Saba vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSaba vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSaba vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSaba vs GPT-6 AstraSaba vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Claude Opus 5.5