Grok 4.7 vs Saba
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Saba is 8.0× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 33K).
| Grok 4.7 | Saba | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.60 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.80 | $0.60 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.40 | $0.30 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.40 | $0.02 |
| Context window | 500K | 33K |
| Max output | 450K | 26K |
| Intelligence index | 46.4 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 4 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2025-02-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Saba?
Saba is 8.0× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Grok 4.7 vs Saba: which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens. Saba: 32,768 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600, Saba ≈ $700.00.
More comparisons
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Saba vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSaba vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSaba vs Command A+Saba vs GPT-6 Luna ProSaba vs GPT-6 LunaSaba vs GPT-6 Sol ProSaba vs GPT-6 SolSaba vs Claude Opus 5.5