MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Saba

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Saba

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
M
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 42% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashSaba
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.28$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.30
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.02
Context window1M33K
Max output131K26K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers2—
Best provider uptime (30m)99.2%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212025-02-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Saba?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 42% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Saba: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Saba: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Saba ≈ $700.00.

More comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Saba vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSaba vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSaba vs Command A+Saba vs GPT-6 Luna ProSaba vs GPT-6 LunaSaba vs GPT-6 Sol ProSaba vs GPT-6 SolSaba vs Claude Opus 5.5