Saba vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Saba is 20.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
| Saba | Qwen3.8 Max Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.20 | $4.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60 | $12.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.30 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.02 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 33K | 1M |
| Max output | 26K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-02-17 | 2026-09-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Saba or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
Saba is 20.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Saba vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Saba ≈ $700.00, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.
More comparisons
Saba vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSaba vs Command A+Saba vs GPT-6 Luna ProSaba vs GPT-6 LunaSaba vs GPT-6 Sol ProSaba vs GPT-6 SolSaba vs Claude Opus 5.5Saba vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedSaba vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSaba vs Grok 4.7Saba vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSaba vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSaba vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSaba vs GPT-6 AstraSaba vs GPT-6 Astra ProSaba vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed